Build
Does the packaged experience fit, or is the ministry adapting itself to the software?
Church platform comparison
Pushpay offers giving, church management, and app products in church-focused packages. Rehost builds and runs a custom experience so ministry teams can stay close to people instead of software.
Reviewed 2026-08-14
Does the packaged experience fit, or is the ministry adapting itself to the software?
Which system owns identity, gifts, groups, content, and communication consent?
How much ministry time is now platform administration?
What Rehost is opinionated about
A trusted giving or church management platform can remain in place while the app, website, communications, and service journeys are designed around the community. The architecture should follow ministry responsibility, not a desire to replace everything.
A long feature list can hide the decision. Begin with the work customers and staff need completed every week.
A booking, giving, CRM, or builder account does not need to disappear simply because the customer experience needs work.
Builds, connections, releases, support, data, and vendor failures need a named owner before anything goes live.
Compare subscriptions, outside help, staff time, upkeep, releases, and the work that waits when nobody owns it.
The short answer
Choose Pushpay when its giving, church management, app, and multi-campus packages fit the church. Choose Rehost when the customer-facing experience needs custom workflows and an operating team. A church may use both when each system has a clear job.
Side by side
Feature counts are useful only when they explain who does the work. This table combines the product facts with the Build, Connect, and Run responsibilities that appear after launch.
| Decision | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build: Does the packaged experience fit, or is the ministry adapting itself to the software? | Builds an approved custom app, website, and member workflow around the organization's priorities. | Pushpay packages church giving, apps, management, and related capabilities. |
| Connect: Which system owns identity, gifts, groups, content, and communication consent? | Plans supported connections and assigns one team to the customer-facing path. | Current plan and product capabilities determine supported integrations and API access. |
| Run: How much ministry time is now platform administration? | Handles approved product changes and releases through an ongoing service relationship. | Church staff administers the platform and works with the vendor's support model. |
| Primary product | A managed custom customer or community experience across approved systems. | Pushpay packages giving and apps, church management, and ChurchStaq capabilities for churches.Sources 1, 2 |
| Published pricing model | A monthly managed service with current plan scope and outside costs stated or confirmed in writing. | Pushpay's pricing page describes Core, Advanced, and Complete packages and asks churches to request pricing. It does not publish one dollar amount for every buyer.Sources 1 |
| Integration and scale | Supported connections and multi-location needs are reviewed as part of the operating scope. | The official page associates Advanced with integrations and API capabilities and Complete with added multi-site and per-campus capabilities.Sources 1 |
| Branded app | The app is shaped around the approved customer and ministry workflows, with Rehost operating the releases. | Pushpay describes church mobile app capabilities as part of its product packages.Sources 1, 2 |
By the numbers
They describe the commercial shape of the relationship. The written scope still controls the exact work, systems, access, and outside costs.
14 days
$0
1 team
Best fit
Neither side wins every decision. The right choice depends on the responsibility your organization wants to keep.
The practical switch
A responsible plan may keep giving or church management in Pushpay while Rehost operates a custom member experience. Before promising that plan, verify package access, API support, identity, consent, data movement, reconciliation, and the response when a connection fails.
Map gifts, people, groups, content, and communication consent.
Confirm current package and supported API access with Pushpay.
Assign ownership for reconciliation, member support, and connection failures.
Evidence
Pushpay package, integration, multi-site, and mobile-app facts come from official Pushpay pages, reviewed on August 14, 2026. Pushpay uses custom quotes, so verify the current written offer.
Official Core, Advanced, and Complete package information, including integrations, API, and multi-site positioning.
Official overview of the church mobile app product.
Official dated product-release information for checking current capabilities.
Reviewed 2026-08-14. Prices, promotions, capabilities, and terms can change. A current written quote and signed agreement control over this page.
Cost, ownership, rebuilds, access, and who keeps the work—answered plainly.
Not automatically. A trusted giving system may remain in place. Rehost can operate the approved member experience around it when access, consent, reconciliation, and responsibilities support that plan.
Pushpay describes packages on its official pricing page and asks churches to request pricing. Use the actual quote, transaction terms, add-ons, implementation details, and internal administration time for a fair comparison.
Rehost can scope multi-campus roles, content, locations, communication, and reporting. Any connection to Pushpay depends on current package access, supported APIs, data rules, and written responsibilities.
Customers retain the content and customer data they provide. Software, code, designs, accounts, licenses, exports, transition, and end-of-service terms follow the signed agreement.
We look at the system you have, the work people do around it, and the part that is causing trouble. Then we say what should stay, what needs work, and what Rehost would own.
No. A rebuild is expensive and disruptive. We recommend one only when the current foundation cannot support the next responsible step.
Yes. Good people and useful vendors do not need to disappear. The written plan needs to say who decides, who changes what, and who handles a failure.
Compare the full job. Include subscriptions, outside help, staff time, release work, support, and the cost of work that waits because nobody owns it.
Enough to verify the problem. That may include a working demo, account settings, error details, store access, vendor notes, or a current bill. Access follows a written scope and appropriate safeguards.
Show us the app, the quote, the systems that must stay, and the work landing on staff. We will map the responsible next step.