Nobody can explain the whole system
The screens work, but authentication, data rules, integrations, environment variables, and vendor accounts are not documented together.
Rehost reviews apps created with AI tools, fixes the parts that cannot be operated reliably, and puts testing, releases, accounts, and ongoing support around the product.
Yes—Rehost can take over an app built with AI tools.
The deciding factor is not how the first version was generated. It is whether the product, accounts, data, dependencies, and release path can be understood and operated safely. Rehost reviews those facts before proposing repairs or replacement work.
AI shortens the path to a working interface. These gaps still become real operating work once customers depend on it.
The screens work, but authentication, data rules, integrations, environment variables, and vendor accounts are not documented together.
There is no dependable test or release path, so prompting another change can silently alter an unrelated workflow.
Secrets, permissions, user roles, data access, and dependency risk were accepted as generated defaults instead of reviewed controls.
Real users arrived before monitoring, backups, error handling, account ownership, and ongoing maintenance had a named owner.
Rehost uses AI where it helps, then applies the controls required for a product that customers actually use.
Reproduce the important workflows, map the stack and accounts, inspect the code and dependencies, and identify data or security risks.
Production brief
Protect critical paths, add the checks the current product needs, repair recoverable parts, and verify the release outside production when possible.
Verified release
Assign monitoring, releases, routine fixes, included changes, vendor accounts, and the request path to an explicit operating scope.
Named owner
The takeover defines what can be accelerated, what must be verified, and who is responsible once the app is live.
Use these pages to compare AI automation work, managed applications, and the broader recovery path.
Direct answers about takeover, code review, rebuilds, AI use, timing, and the first review.
Yes, when the project, code, accounts, dependencies, and data flows can be reviewed. Rehost evaluates the actual application rather than assuming an AI-assisted build is either production-ready or unusable.
Not automatically. Rehost first checks what is working, what can be tested, and which risks are structural. The recommendation may be repair, replacement of specific parts, or a rebuild when the current foundation cannot be operated safely.
The review can cover application behavior, authentication, data handling, secrets, dependencies, integrations, environments, observability, release controls, and the gap between the intended workflow and the deployed product.
Rehost uses appropriate engineering tools, including AI-assisted tools, to speed review and implementation. Production work still follows access controls, testing, human review, and release verification.
Timing depends on access, test coverage, data risk, dependencies, integrations, and the release path. Rehost can begin reviewing quickly, but gives a repair target only after the product and its operating constraints are understood.
Bring the live app or preview, project or repository access, a description of the failure, the intended user workflow, known integrations, and the accounts used for hosting, stores, data, payments, and analytics.
Rehost will trace what exists, identify the production gaps, and define the safest next release before changing the live product.